Monday, December 18, 2006
Walberg Speaks On Iraq
Setting the tone for his next two years in Congress, Congressman-elect Tim Walberg (R) speaks out on Iraq. What are Walberg's thoughts on the situation?
And for Congressman Elect Tim Walberg of the 7th district, this is one of his biggest concerns.This is more or less the only quote of substance from the WILX story... I'm always hesitant to use local television news stories because they can be light on information, but I thought this was worth talking about.
So let's look closely at just what Walberg is saying.
Tim wholeheartedly supports President Bush in the War on Terror. He supports Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and our troops as they finish the mission in Iraq to assure the victory of freedom over tyranny.During the debate at Siena Heights University before the election, these were my notes on Walberg's response to the question, "Do you support a withdrawal from Iraq? If not, what future course do you see?":
WalbergFrom all of this, I hope you'll agree it's safe to characterize Congressman-elect Walberg's position as this: He supports President Bush and the Iraq policy of former Sec. of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. He believes withdrawing (and, probably, a timetable for withdrawal) would be a mistake, and believes Iraq is the central front of the War on Terror. In other words, he supports President Bush-- and Bush's rhetoric-- 100 percent.
If anyone thinks this is a misrepresentation of his position, please say so in the comments. I'd say it's a fair characterization.
So does Walberg's stance line up with most Americans? From PollingReport.com (formatting edited and emphasis added):
Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg Poll. Dec. 8-11, 2006. N=1,489 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3. RV = registered voters... And there's plenty more where that came from, with polling done by several different organizations. Clearly, the country is headed in a different direction than Congressman-elect Walberg.
Still, I'd like to apologize. When I started this post, I had planned to offer a good look at Tim Walberg's position on the war in Iraq, and refute it with solid facts, not polling data. But I can't do that. Why? Because, except for some vague statements and election campaign soundbites, it doesn't seem like Walberg really has any ideas for Iraq.
I'll gladly do another post when he has a position. Until then...
To paraphrase Gen. Schwarzkopf on Hussein in the mother of all press conferences following our sweep of Kuwait, just think Walberg instead of Saddam:
"He is not a soldier, general nor a leader, he is not schooled in tactics, logistics or strategy, he has no experience the art of warfare...other than that he's a great military man."
(This is close to what he said.)
Our Congressman elect has no real understanding of the issue beyond what any one of us might thing. His comments since winning the seat scare the hell out of me. He does not appear to be making an effort to understand the situation other than reading the administration's comments and stance. Patriotism is one thing, but he has a duty to be informed and he is spending his time doing something else.Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008