Thursday, April 12, 2007
Walberg Ignores Constituents
From the mail bag: more evidence that Walberg would rather ignore uncomfortable complaints from his constituents. I hear that Walberg ignores unfriendly constituent letters as well.
Our thanks to Mark for the note and the info.
I don't understand because parts of Lodi Township are just as safe as Bagdad as long as you don't count vehicle/deer crashes I suppose.
If I were the good congressman I would be afraid to answer questions too.
I think we need to start calling Walberg the "Don Imus" of the house. He runs his mouth and people are insulted and embarrassed.
But then again, that probably wouldn't be fair to Don Imus.
This is Mark, the original poster of the email. I've actually written Mr. Walberg repeatedly to either suggest how he should vote on an upcoming piece of legislation or to comment on a vote that he made (like noting my disapproval). Up to now, so far, neither he nor anyone in his office has directly acknowledged my letters. This is incredulous, mostly because I have gotten serious, personalized letters from our Senators Levin and Stabenow, and from our former reps as well. But not Walberg. Nothing. Not a pip. I guess if you don't agree with him, you're not a faithful constituent worth hearing from.
I'm on the mailing lists of most of our representatives and senators, both state and federal officials so I try and read everything on what our elected officials have to say. So I even get Walberg's occasional press releases on what he claims to have accomplished. But I don't get any sense that he wants to hear from anyone who disagrees with him.
Did anyone read the article about Walter Reed today on the front page of the Battle Creek Enquirer? It is online also. Walberg has one quote in the middle:
"It's really a problem with one outpatient care building," said Walberg, who represents the 7th District, which includes Battle Creek, "and those problems are being addressed."
That quote is in stark contrast to the facts in the article. This is just more proof that Walberg is in over his head. I'd much rather have a Congressman who knew when to keep his mouth shut that one who spouts off irresponsibly on serious issues.
The Thoughtless Theocrat of Tipton strikes again...
Good god, I just read the Walter Reed article. Is Walberg really THAT clueless? And the contrast to Dr. Schwarz and his participation on the review team and his comments just blows you away...
I was reading the Sharnon Renier campaign page and I think we need to start calling him Little W....
For what it's worth, the Washington Post quoted Schwarz numerous times on the Walter Reed situation yesterday.
Maybe Walberg should get a subscription.
I wonder if he is going to keep giving us one reason every single month to distrust/ dislike and, in his collegues cases, disregard him?
Putting your foot in your mouth does not do justice to Walberg's mistakes. I cannot figure out which one of the following is a better description (maybe Fitzy can do an online poll???)
Is Tim Walberg examining his knee with his tonsils? Or is Walberg visually inspecting his transverse colon? Either way, we as voters are accountable and have no one to blame but ourselves for how we must look to the rest of the country.
Up to now, so far, neither he nor anyone in his office has directly acknowledged my letters.
For the first month after he arrived in D.C., I, also didn't receive any responses to my phone calls or emails. But starting in February, I've received five letters and each a direct answer to my phone calls requesting he vote a particular way on various bills.
Of course, he wasn't going to listen to me--someone he knows well and who has argued with him for over 20 years. But at least he responded--though vapid were his comments.
Take heart, Mark. You may soon be receiving one of his irrelevant letters. And after reading them, you'll even wonder why he bothered.
Not trying to cut Walberg any slack, but if you mail your letters to anyone in Congress, they take upwards of four weeks to get through security. Remember the anthrax scare back in 2001? All letters now go to some sort of facility to undergo a security check. I had a friend that sent a letter to a different member of Congress and did not get a timely response. He finally called and learned this information. So, email or fax your letters and you might get a faster response.Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008