Thursday, October 25, 2007
SCHIP - The Next Round
Bumped to the top of the page, since it's kind of important... - Fitzy
The Hill brings us the latest on efforts to pass an SCHIP reauthorization:
The revised measure will include provisions prohibiting coverage of adults, preventing families with incomes of 300 percent of the poverty level from qualifying for the program, and making it harder for illegal immigrants to sign up for the program.and finally,
Liberal activists are carrying out ad campaigns in the districts of seven House Republicans calling out the lawmakers for their votes against the SCHIP bills.Obviously, having not seen or read the compromise bill (actually, the second compromise... the original version was bigger than the one eventually passed and vetoed), I can't say whether or not it is good or bad. However, I can say that if it addresses the issues of adults on SCHIP, higher-income families, and illegal immigrants, Congressman Walberg really has no legitimate reason to vote against it. Those were his complaints, and the Democratic leadership says they've addressed them.
Please keep in mind, however, that in the bill Walberg voted against, all of his objections were already addressed. This would just be tougher language.
So, House Democrats have made moves to compromise. Will Congressman Walberg?
We'll find out tomorrow.
UPDATE: Er... we'll find out today. I hadn't realized it was after midnight!
Being that Walberg is not a constitutionalist, but instead, a neocon in the Bush/Clinton mold, I predict he will vote for this assault on the Constitution, which will result in even greater healthcare costs and worse care for everyone, including children.
The Republicans are better off passing a SCHIP program now before they lose control of congress and the White House. A new internet show called 'The Raymond Report' focused on one family's need for SCHIP and the host has an interesting take on new, intrusive trends taking place now because of the new HIPPA laws that most people don't even know about. Some states already let companies fire employees for smoking or not hire smokers. Now, employers can raise insurance rates on employees who don't want to participatein new corporate 'Wellness Programs' . So while the SCHIP program is a necessity, what happends to people who have access to medical insurance but may get priced out because of smoking or even diets and personal habits. Check out http://mnr.onthescene.com/raymond-report/episode2.html
The host is set up as a watchdog and has a team of investigators for people with healthcare problems
With the new provisions in this version of the S-CHIP bill, Walberg is going to have to invent new reasons he won't vote for it.
Walberg is not a constitutionalist. He'd like the US to be governed by a theocracy--christian, of course.
anonymous #4 - Hey, you're preaching to the choir. I know that. I said, "Being that he is NOT a constitutionalist." I often refer to him as Mullah Walberg.Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008