Monday, August 11, 2008
Schauer Introduces Energy Plan in Michigan Senate
While Tim Walberg is staging a protest in Washington, D.C. and waving his energy plan around on television, Democratic challenger and state Senator Mark Schauer introduced a bill in the Michigan Senate to do what he can do to increase energy production and create jobs:
Highlights of Schauer’s “Drill Responsibly-Create New Energy Jobs” include:As far as I can tell, the text of Schauer's bill isn't online yet. I'll add a link as soon as I can find it. We'll have to wait another day for more in-district media coverage, but the Chicago Tribune gives us this AP article:
LANSING, Mich. - Oil and gas companies would pay Michigan higher royalty fees when leasing government-owned land under a plan by a top Democrat who wants to spend the extra revenue on renewable energy projects.I don't know enough about the proposal yet to speak intelligently on it. Chris Gautz at the Citizen Patriot seems to think investing the money in environmentally-friendly energy research isn't allowed by the state constitution, but I'm not sure if that's true or not.
Even so, this is a good contrast to the Walberg energy plan, which is a "give everything to the oil companies" plan. It'll be interesting to see the coverage this gets moving forward.
Hello. I love the blog.Post a Comment
I'm an outdoor rec./environment blogger and I follow park/open space funding pretty closely.
My problem with Schauer's proposal is the way it undercuts the voter-approved dedication of mineral extraction lease funds to the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund.
The state general fund has zero money for new parkland acquisition or much for park improvements, so the MNRTF has been just about the only way for communities to improve parks or add greenspace.
In Lenawee County, for example, the funds were used to construct a pedestrian bridge at Tate Park. In the past, funds have been used for projects like the acquisition of the tip of the Keweenaw Peninsula.
Would the size of Michigan's share under Schauer's proposal reduce the number of leases signed and decrease the size of the MNRTF? Would the use of MNRTF monies for "green" energy projects open the fund for future raids? Wouldn't an additional use for these funds ignore a voter-approved constitutional amendment?
Schauer's idea is a good way to differentiate himself from Walberg and his drill-offshore/build-nuke-plants-in-the-7th positions.
And Schauer is better than Walberg on conservation issues in the same way that Mother Theresa is better than Jeffrey Dahmer in feeding the poor.
But I don't think that it would be good public policy.
Here's a post about the subject on my blog:
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008