Saturday, September 30, 2006
Horn (Constitution Party) Says: Vote Walberg
More news this week from the Battle Creek Enquirer:
It's not often that you have a candidate that comes out publicly to say that he doesn't want the job he's running for, so of course this caught my attention. There are, of course, two forgotten candidates for Congress in our 7th District. Robert Hutchinson is the Libertarian nominee for Congress (in 2004, Libertarian Ken Proctor got 3,034 votes, or 1 percent), and David Horn is the U.S. Taxpayers Party nominee. Horn ran for Congress in 2004 as well, earning 9,032 votes, or 3 percent-- many of whom were disaffected Walberg supporters.
The U.S. Taxpayers Party is the state affiliate of the Constitution Party. I'll come back to that in a moment. But first, why won't David Horn campaign for Congress?
Yes, that's right. David Horn agrees with Tim Walberg on 90 percent of the issues. Or, conversely, one could say that Tim Walberg agrees with the Constitution Party on 90 percent of the issues.
So what do David Horn and the Constitution Party stand for? They say that they support returning to a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and a focus on Christian values as the basis for American laws. No Separation of Church and State for these folks. Let's look at a few issues.
I support abolition of the income tax and repeal of the 16th Amendment. I wish to restore taxation to that prescribed by our Founders: tariffs and excise taxes.Not quite the same as Tim Walberg, who instead supports a national sales tax. But still, just as constricting and regressive.
How about "family values"?
That bit does sound a lot like Tim Walberg, actually.
Then, there's federal spending:
While not exactly what Tim Walberg has said, it has the same tone to it. Walberg and his supporters advocate a small, disengaged government, which does as little as possible for its citizens. The Constitution Party, by the way, also calls for the elimination of the Department of Education, the Department of Energy, the Department of Health and Human Services, the gradual elimination of Social Security, and a host of other important government programs.
Feel free to browse the party platform and Horn's issue position. It's interesting, to say the least. Also check out the Wikipedia entry on the party.
And apparently David Horn, Constitution Party candidate, agrees with Tim Walberg on 90 percent of the issues.
To moderates in the Republican Party and Democrats unsure of Renier's chances of winning, I ask that one considers the type of government Tim Walberg and those like him hope to create. Religious intolerance becomes part of the law, government ceases to provide essential services, and state governments struggle to cover the needs of their citizens. True, we have strayed from the original text of the Constitution in some areas-- but then, a lot has changed since 1789. Do you really want to go back to that?
And to those who have been unsure whether to vote for Tim Walberg, a Republican, or David Horn, the U.S. Taxpayers/Constitution Party candidate, I say: go ahead and vote for Horn, the one who you agree with 100 percent of the time. Don't vote for Walberg.
Labels: 2006 Election
Horn is even more irrelevant than Walberg. It seems we have a choice between deeply shallow people in this election.
It is also worth noting here that Walberg campaigned for David Horn during the last election. Walberg refused to endorse Joe Schwarz and instead urged his followers to support the Constitution Party candidate. He is loyal only to himself and he is a poor example of a Republican.
Obviously, Walberg's a RINO. Schwarz was the only true Republican choice in this race. Too bad his base didn't come out and vote. We're going to suffer with this pretender for two years now.
Grrr...Post a Comment
The reason that the Constitution/USTP is "endorsing" Walberg is that it reflects a massive GOTV effort on the part of conservatives in the 7th. I've read Renier's interviews where she claims to have the votes, but from what I can tell, it's more wish than reality.
As a dedicated Democrat who's done organizing in the past, I have to say... "WHAT THE HECK IS RENIER THINKING???" In probably the most Democratic-leaning area in the eastern 7th, Walberg signs are popping up like gangbusters. The only thing I could get on Renier was a 4x12" glossy "one pager" with Renier's picture from the county Democratic party campagin office. I've requested yard signs on Renier's web site and on Renier's phone line.... with no response so far!
Most people in my area don't know the name Renier, but they do know the name Walberg. That's enough to make Walberg win. Renier MUST engage in some organizing, and not just conduct the one-woman door-to-door campaignt hat she relied on last time around. Face-to-face is great, but you can have a bunch of college kids doing the same work for free!
Despite the round-the-clock media coverage of Republican woes, they are going to have a massive GOTV effort in Michigan. The Family Research Council declared a few months back that Michigan's one of their "battleground states," and have taken to registering massively at megachurches. The reason most people don't hear about this is because the "Christian" media in Michigan is highly segregated, audience-wise, from the mainstream.
Unless Renier starts getting some more boots on the ground besides her own, she's doomed.
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008