Monday, October 15, 2007
Mark Schauer's Third Quarter Fundraising
Finally, the FEC report for the numbers we've been talking about for a while...
Short Version: Senator Schauer raised $220,117.88. That's about one and a half times more than Congressman Walberg raised, and Schauer did it in much less time-- just five weeks, instead of a full quarter.
Another powerful item: Combined, David Nacht and Jim Berryman raised about $210,000 in the second quarter. Schauer, all on his own, has raised more.
It's clear that Schauer will be a well-financed challenger if he keeps this up for the next year.
Here's the FEC's detailed summary page:
Schauer's cash-on-hand is about 60 percent of what Walberg has on hand, but that gap should close in future quarters. After all, Walberg's been doing this longer than Schauer has.
You can see the contributors list (PACs, etc. and individuals who contributed over $200) here and the expenditures list here.
Aside from other political committees, I only saw four names that contributed from non-Michigan addresses on my first read. That's certainly better than Tim Walberg's absurdly high amount of out-of-state money.
Some notable contributions include money from state Representative Pam Byrnes (D-Chelsea), $1,000 from Nacht for Congress, two contributions from Nancy Pelosi for Congress (the Speaker's campaign committee), Hoyer for Congress (House Majority Leader), Dingell for Congress, Levin for Congress, and the Granholm Leadership Fund. Lots of institutional support.
Did I miss anything significant?
Looks like Nacht was a fraud/ Schauer stalking horse from the beginning. Nacht immediately drops out when Schauer announces.
Schauer will be Republican-lite, DLC, let's not take positions on controversial issue (like the war in Iraq or the Patriot Act).
The Dem "leadership" is buying this congressional seat just as the Club for Growth bought the seat for Walberg.
The best democracy money can buy.
Anonymous and Jason -- whoever you are -- you clearly don't know me. I really want the job and think I'd be good at it. I was working pretty hard there....Post a Comment
But I am a realist, and I recognize Schauer's appeal in the district and ability to raise funds. Also, I have genuine respect for the guy. How you convert that set of facts into calling my short-lived candidacy a "fraud" or "stalking horse" is beyond me. Why not work positively for Schauer (or another Democratic candidate if you are so inclined) instead of engaging in character attacks?
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008